Last year, I read a little book called Sundays At Tiffany’s by James Patterson and Gabrielle Charbonnet. The premise sounded really sweet: little girl has an imaginary friend who “abandons” her as a child, then reappears later in life . . . in the flesh. And just at a time of great flux and turmoil in her life, proving that maybe first loves can be more powerful than anything.
Yes, friends, I had high hopes for that story — especially with Patterson’s name splashed across the cover — but it turned out to be utter drivel. Poorly written and lacking any possible nuance, I found it condescending and actually ridiculous. I would have been willing to set aside the completely improbably plot without difficulty had the book just not been awful. But it was. To date, it is the only book I’ve ever read and reviewed to get a one-star rating. And I think that was generous.
So it was with a certain amount of trepidation that I hunkered down with my mom and sister last week, watching Mom page through her DVR looking for a good holiday movie with which to unwind on a quiet weeknight. She stopped on a title that was was familiar to me — and my lip actually curled in disgust.
“How about this one — ‘Sundays At Tiffany’s’?” Mom began, looking over at my sister and me. Katie was on the floor wrapping a mountain of gifts; my nose was, as always, in a book.
I briefly looked up from my copy of The Love Goddess’ Cooking School to offer a look of utter contempt. “What? They seriously made that into a movie? That was the worst book I’ve ever read.”
I wasn’t feeling too charitable that Tuesday.
“Oh.” Mom looked away, stunned at my vehemence. “Well, I think it looks good. And it has Alyssa Milano in it.”
Not wanting to be a Negative Nancy, I figured I’d said my piece and would leave the ladies to their film . . . which, if it was based on that stunning work of literature, would be awful. I returned to Melissa Senate’s Blue Crab Island and the luscious world of Italian food, figuring I’d just ignore the Lifetime Original Movie glittering in the background.
Which, it turns out, was hard to do.
Considering how much I despised the novel (and have I mentioned I despised it?), the movie was actually . . . really cute. Alyssa Milano plays Jane, the theatre manager still stuck under her mother’s thumb and struggling to make any sort of wedding plans during her engagement to a self-absorbed actor. Michael is her erstwhile “imaginary friend,” a little boy who knew her better than anyone and swept her away from the tedium and loneliness of being her controlling mother’s daughter. They once enjoyed afternoons with her mother at Tiffany’s and made up “stories” about the people around them, wondering what their lives were like, and Jane dreamed of being a writer.
And now Jane spends her time trying to please everyone but herself — and Michael can see that. He appears after twenty years away, dropped onto a New York street and unable to process why he’s suddenly alive and feeling things. And visible. Jane believes she’s going stark-raving mad, of course, and thinks Michael is some sort of crazed stalker out to capitalize on her engagement to a famous man.
Well, he’s not. He’s there to impart some lessons. Show Jane how to love again, trust again, and so on and so forth.
What didn’t come across in the book — any real sense of connection or camaraderie between Jane and Michael; any heat or romance or passion between them — was definitely present in the film. Our movie version shows a pretty, successful but vulnerable Jane, a woman I actually liked and respected, while Michael is the innocent, kind and thoughtful opposite to Jane’s ridiculous fiance. Their chemistry was definitely there and very appealing, and the movie proved to be a sweet escape.
Like all adaptations, the film and book differ — but, you know what? I was completely fine with that. The movie drastically improves upon a story I found silly and boring, and the film was beautifully shot and well acted. A very cozy way to spend a few hours, and my Patterson-hating heart may have twisted a bit several times. Who doesn’t love a good Christmas movie?
It’s rare you’ll hear me (or any other literature lover) saying this, but skip the book and watch the movie. It’s airing now on Lifetime in the U.S.
12 thoughts on “Finally, a version of ‘Sundays At Tiffany’s’ I don’t hate”
I haven’t read or seen this yet.
But when I realized it was written by JP I thought the same thing.
I thought the book will be crap but I will give the movie a chance.
I’m glad to know my hunch was right and I look forward to seeing this.
PS I don’t know why I have such a hard time with JP. His writing style always puts me off. But I still might eventually try this one.
I love when that happens! That is, when a movie is better than the book it is based on. I know, I’m weird, but with commercial fiction I think it happens a lot 🙂
And…this is where we part ways. I actually enjoyed the book. Didn’t love it, mind you, but it was an offered an afternoon of escape last year when I really needed it. I think I’ll skip the film, but I enjoyed your review. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I felt the same way about the book as you did, but I’m glad to hear the movie is better! (although I must admit it’s hard to believe!) :–)
I know I’ve read this book before, but it must have been before I started blogging, so I can’t remember it at all, but I’d love to see the movie version!
I have the book, haven’t read it yet and I recorded this movie to watch!!
I read that and wasn’t wildly impressed either…but, I did record this and haven’t watched yet…
Interesting. I went into Sundays at Tiffany’s knowing it was going to be pure fluff, so I was able to not hate it. 😀 You’ve only ever given one one-star review?? Wow. I guess I must be mean when I review…
I wasn’t going to bother watching this because I heard the book was horrible. Hard to believe that television actually improved something. So, maybe now I’ll watch it.
wow.. i think this is the first time i heard someone tell me the movie was better than the book.
i borrowed this book from the library out of sheer desperation–there were NO other choices–and is was pure dreck. i actively despised it and can’t imagine subjecting myself to the movie version, no matter how cute! lol. sorry, meg.
Comments are closed.